I dig it, she shot her mouth off and got caught. Her story arc is questionable enough to make me wonder “who” grants these clearances in the first place. #47 went off about a journalist blowing the story open on the missing WSO in Iran and this POS gets arrested, and I even mistaked the situation that “she” was the WSO leaker.
I think using “rolling stone” and journalist is the same sentence goes over like a turd in the punch bowl, but I’m Gen X.
That "journalist" looks to be a real piece of work in search of a headline. Army veteran, former lawyer, former assistant attorney general of Texas, and current editor at Rolling Stone.
Might be both had axes to grind. And one was definitely hunting a sensational headline. Curious why the journalist isn't being recalled to active duty, along with the leaker, to face military justice? 🤔
And still, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gets a pass for keeping highly classified data on a computer server in her bathroom, which we know was hacked. The evidence is there on a silver platter for some prosecutor to make a slam dunk but all we hear are crickets. WTF?
She's claiming she was sexually harassed, after signing up for a job where her LOOKS where what was important (because she was supposed to be an attractive woman to sway people I guess?)
So people made sexual comments and she complained.
A reminder that a piece of paper (NDA, restraining order, whatever) may indicate the deterrents for, and consequences of, doing something, but does nothing to actually stop that thing from being done.
I dig it, she shot her mouth off and got caught. Her story arc is questionable enough to make me wonder “who” grants these clearances in the first place. #47 went off about a journalist blowing the story open on the missing WSO in Iran and this POS gets arrested, and I even mistaked the situation that “she” was the WSO leaker.
I think using “rolling stone” and journalist is the same sentence goes over like a turd in the punch bowl, but I’m Gen X.
If only it was a Baby Ruth
STOP RESISTING, Jumpster. Turds in punch bowls are just part of the process in transitioning to Third Worldom.
Don't get your bowels in a bunch
When you see a turd in the punch
Part o' the modern zeitgeist, it is
So, none of that "golly, gee whiz"
But oh what they're servin' for lunch.
That "journalist" looks to be a real piece of work in search of a headline. Army veteran, former lawyer, former assistant attorney general of Texas, and current editor at Rolling Stone.
Might be both had axes to grind. And one was definitely hunting a sensational headline. Curious why the journalist isn't being recalled to active duty, along with the leaker, to face military justice? 🤔
And still, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gets a pass for keeping highly classified data on a computer server in her bathroom, which we know was hacked. The evidence is there on a silver platter for some prosecutor to make a slam dunk but all we hear are crickets. WTF?
Some lizards are more equal than others
She's claiming she was sexually harassed, after signing up for a job where her LOOKS where what was important (because she was supposed to be an attractive woman to sway people I guess?)
So people made sexual comments and she complained.
Not the first time ‘that’ card has been played!
We still have yardarms, don't we?
As for the one who leaked the information, it was either money, ideology, or malice. Pick no more than two.
Ideology or ego. I presume. Leftist, so no conscience, and the usually pay CIA officers fairly well, so probably not money. (MICE to see motive).
From a pic on another site, she looks like a typical AWFL.
John in Indy
Leftist ideology is amoral, then add ego.
Endorphin junkies twerk on the roofs of SUV's doing burnouts in intersections, 15 minutes of fame is no longer enough. People gonna do whatever it takes to out-egregious one another. This all started in 1982 when Ozzy Osbourne bit the head off a bat. https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/03/22/13/67219331-11886341-Osbourne_s_most_famous_moment_was_biting_the_head_off_a_bat_duri-m-22_1679493182567.jpg
A reminder that a piece of paper (NDA, restraining order, whatever) may indicate the deterrents for, and consequences of, doing something, but does nothing to actually stop that thing from being done.
Sadly true…