Discussion about this post

User's avatar
it's just Boris's avatar

It unfortunately makes a lot of sense, from a certain point of view.

Specifically, what need is there for, say, a police force if there is no crime? What need is there for a government if there are no problems that the populace needs to have addressed as a group?

Given that, a way for an entity (individual, or organization) to keep itself in power, is to acknowledge the problem (preferably while blaming it on someone else), promise to fix it, make a great show of doing things that look like they're doing something ... but leave the root of the problem in place.

It's the government version of planned obsolescence.

AJ Decker's avatar

This is just more of the standard lefty play book. (And it is coming out of the oldest sections of that book.) They create, direct, subsidize, or hinder the solving, of a group of criminals and troublemakers. Always in ways that encourage the problems created to get larger, more widespread, and affecting as many people as possible.

Then "promise" to solve the issue, if people would just give them the power to ignore any annoying limits on their authority. (Which I realized as I wrote this, is exactly what Palpatine did in parts 1-3 of Star Wars.)

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?