In regards to the information in the article, this was all well-known to anyone who was digging up the data, Miscarriages skyrocketed and even the media couldn't suppress that knowledge. The Birth Rate in all countries that did vaccines dropped precipitously as well. I wonder if that's recovered or not? As several of the Vaccine's supporters were people who believe in population control by any means necessary and who have gotten in trouble with other governments for practicing what they preached, none of this surprised anybody who was paying attention.
I have several collections of encyclopedia's and dictionaries.
'Palestinians' were invented in the early 70's. There is no such people, no such race. I have encyclopedia's and dictionaries going back to like the 40s (30's at my parent's house, I should bring those home).
Anyway, that's just the first example, but in the last 20 years they've been changing history regularly and in the last 10 the government has been changing the meaning of words (like Vaccine) and as many of the dictionary companies are now run by lefties, they've been happy to fall in line.
There has always been propaganda that book companies and hollywood supported (Remember 'On the Beach'? That author ONLY wrote propaganda. 'Failsafe'? Same F'in thing - remember Henry Fonda was a commie).
There was that big 'history' novel about America that was actually paid for by the USSR, to rewrite American history. 'The Ballad of Buster Scruggs' was a much more recent case of Hollywood commies rewriting American history.
“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” - Orwell
Memory holes, the quashing of dissident speech & subversive private reflection (thought crimes), the eradication of counternarratives, the control over what are the objective truths. 1984 wasn't fiction.
I bought a set of Encyclopedia Britannica in 1979 after my children were born. I gave it away after the kids were grown and gone around 2003 because I discovered I had the knowledge of the world at my call by clacking on a keyboard. Gah!
Having worked heavily with the internet and even the development thereof, I saw the people involved and I knew it was gonna be messed up from the beginning. Especially after Obama turned the control of it over to the very people who hated truth and honesty.
Wikipedia is not accurate. ditto AI. Use Murray Gell-Mann's postulate. If the media isn't accurate on the things you know, why should they suddenly be accurate on what you don't know. I Agree with Mr Van Stry I find I generally do. probably because he thinks. And certainly Old NFO to whom thanks.
It appears that the putpose of the "rage bait" is to influence emotional and underlying attitudes quickly, rather than to apply reason to convince the audience of the facts of a situation.
Outrageous, simple, memorable, and appealing to confirmation bias seems to be the pattern of these headlines, always in hope that the reader will absorb the emotional position and definition without caring about facts or alternatives.
And yes, too many of the sources that are available for interested people to use to check facts and history are themselves deliberately corrupted. Printed matter is at least insulated from deletion or editing post publication, unlike the online equivalents.
In regards to the information in the article, this was all well-known to anyone who was digging up the data, Miscarriages skyrocketed and even the media couldn't suppress that knowledge. The Birth Rate in all countries that did vaccines dropped precipitously as well. I wonder if that's recovered or not? As several of the Vaccine's supporters were people who believe in population control by any means necessary and who have gotten in trouble with other governments for practicing what they preached, none of this surprised anybody who was paying attention.
I have several collections of encyclopedia's and dictionaries.
'Palestinians' were invented in the early 70's. There is no such people, no such race. I have encyclopedia's and dictionaries going back to like the 40s (30's at my parent's house, I should bring those home).
Anyway, that's just the first example, but in the last 20 years they've been changing history regularly and in the last 10 the government has been changing the meaning of words (like Vaccine) and as many of the dictionary companies are now run by lefties, they've been happy to fall in line.
There has always been propaganda that book companies and hollywood supported (Remember 'On the Beach'? That author ONLY wrote propaganda. 'Failsafe'? Same F'in thing - remember Henry Fonda was a commie).
There was that big 'history' novel about America that was actually paid for by the USSR, to rewrite American history. 'The Ballad of Buster Scruggs' was a much more recent case of Hollywood commies rewriting American history.
It never ends.
“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” - Orwell
Memory holes, the quashing of dissident speech & subversive private reflection (thought crimes), the eradication of counternarratives, the control over what are the objective truths. 1984 wasn't fiction.
I bought a set of Encyclopedia Britannica in 1979 after my children were born. I gave it away after the kids were grown and gone around 2003 because I discovered I had the knowledge of the world at my call by clacking on a keyboard. Gah!
Having worked heavily with the internet and even the development thereof, I saw the people involved and I knew it was gonna be messed up from the beginning. Especially after Obama turned the control of it over to the very people who hated truth and honesty.
Remember a time when a person only needed to be really skeptical on April Fools’ Day? Pepperage Farm Remembers….
Wikipedia is not accurate. ditto AI. Use Murray Gell-Mann's postulate. If the media isn't accurate on the things you know, why should they suddenly be accurate on what you don't know. I Agree with Mr Van Stry I find I generally do. probably because he thinks. And certainly Old NFO to whom thanks.
It appears that the putpose of the "rage bait" is to influence emotional and underlying attitudes quickly, rather than to apply reason to convince the audience of the facts of a situation.
Outrageous, simple, memorable, and appealing to confirmation bias seems to be the pattern of these headlines, always in hope that the reader will absorb the emotional position and definition without caring about facts or alternatives.
And yes, too many of the sources that are available for interested people to use to check facts and history are themselves deliberately corrupted. Printed matter is at least insulated from deletion or editing post publication, unlike the online equivalents.
John in Indy